Who believes in whole-genome scans for selection?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Controlling false discoveries in genome scans for selection.
Population differentiation (PD) and ecological association (EA) tests have recently emerged as prominent statistical methods to investigate signatures of local adaptation using population genomic data. Based on statistical models, these genomewide testing procedures have attracted considerable attention as tools to identify loci potentially targeted by natural selection. An important issue with...
متن کاملRanks of genuine associations in whole-genome scans.
With the recent advances in high-throughput genotyping techniques, it is now possible to perform whole-genome association studies to fine map causal polymorphisms underlying important traits that influence susceptibility to human diseases and efficacy of drugs. Once a genome scan is completed the results can be sorted by the association statistic value. What is the probability that true positiv...
متن کاملThe emergence of whole genome association scans in barley.
Barley geneticists are currently using association genetics to identify and fine map traits directly in elite plant breeding material. This has been made possible by the development of a highly parallel SNP assay platform that provides sufficient marker density for genome-wide scans and linkage disequilibrium-led gene identification. By leveraging the combined resources of the barley research a...
متن کاملGenome-wide scans for footprints of natural selection
Detecting recent selected 'genomic footprints' applies directly to the discovery of disease genes and in the imputation of the formative events that molded modern population genetic structure. The imprints of historic selection/adaptation episodes left in human and animal genomes allow one to interpret modern and ancestral gene origins and modifications. Current approaches to reveal selected re...
متن کاملWho “Believes” in the Gambler’s Fallacy and Why?
Humans possess a remarkable ability to discriminate structure from randomness in the environment. However, this ability appears to be systematically biased. This is nowhere more evident than in the Gambler's Fallacy (GF)-the mistaken belief that observing an increasingly long sequence of "heads" from an unbiased coin makes the occurrence of "tails" on the next trial ever more likely. Although t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Heredity
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0018-067X,1365-2540
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.101